Notes |
- A case between Henry de Mapletone and Roger le Stedeman of Easeborne (Ashborne) and Alice his wife, deforcients, was heard at Nottingham during the court term of 31 March-21April 1252. The case involved real estate situated in the village of Dale and claimed by both the plaintiff and the deforcients.
________________
He could be the Roger Stedeman from this:
"Three Early Assize Rolls for the County of Northumberland, S AEC. XIII., Andrews & Co., Durham, 1891.
Assize Roll, Northumberland, 7 Edw. I. (1279), p. 343
Pars comitatus citra Coket venit per duodecim.
...
Willelmus le Sclater, Rogerus Stedeman, Ranulphus Sehapawey, Johannes et Thomas, filii domini Johannis de Fornacres, Patricius, armiger dicti domini Johannis, Robertus filius Willelmi de Molton, Johannes de Hundmanebi, et Hugo le Sclatiere burgaverunt domum Ricardi filii Sweyn de Heton et statim fugit usque in libertatem Episcopi Dunelmensis apud Fornacres, praeter Rogerum Stedeman qui fugit in Scotia, et malecreduntur, ideo exigantur et utlagentur. Catalla ejusdem Ranulphi Schapawey xvj d', unde vicecomes respondeat.
---- Google Translation ----
Part of the county on this side of Coke he came upon the twelve.
...
William le Sclater, Roger Stedeman, Ralph Sehapawey, John and Thomas, the son of Sir John de Fornacres, Patrick, squire of the said Lord John, by Robert son of William of Molton, John of Hundmanebi, and Hugh le Sclatiere burgaverunt the house of Richard the son of Sweyn of Heaton and immediately the as far as he fled into the liberty of the Bishop of Durham, with Fornacres, in addition to Roger Stedeman and he fled into Scotland, and they are suspected, for that reason let them be exacted and outlawed. Chattels of the same sixteen Schapawey Randolph, d ', for which the sheriff is to answer.
|